Analisis Kesesatan Patih Sengkuni dalam Perspektif Ajaran Agama Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58472/jipsh.v1i1.24Kata Kunci:
Analysis, Heresy, Patih SengkuniAbstrak
Patih Sengkuni is a puppet character who has a cunning, misguided and misleading character (dhal wal mudhil). This qualitative research using literature study will analyze Patih Sengkuni's misguided behavior from the perspective of Islamic religious teachings. The data analysis technique uses content analysis by sorting things according to the focus and objectives of the research. This research resulted in the conclusion that several of Patih Sengkuni's significant errors related to the prohibition of Islamic teachings, include: his fondness for cursing with the HR. Ahmad; significant hasud with HR. Bukhari and Muslim; likes to slander significantly with QS. Al-Buruj verse 10 and QS. Al-Baqarah verse 191; fond of cheating significantly with HR. Muslim, QS. An-Nahl verse 105, and HR. Abu Daud; significant cheating with QS. Al-Muthaffifin verse 1; cruel inhumane significant with QS. Ibrahim verse 42 and QS. As-Syuara verse 227; always aspire to high office with a significant evil path with QS. Al-Hadid verse 20 and QS. Al-Baqarah verse 188; likes to demonize significant opponents with QS. Al-Hujurat verse 11, QS. Al-Humazah verse 1, and HR. Turmudzi; and justify any significant means with QS. Al-A'raf verse 56 and QS. Al-Maidah verse 33. Apart from that, in fact Patih Sengkuni's misguided and misleading character (dhal wal mudhil) is still very numerous and cannot be counted, so it can be said that there is nothing positive in him at all.
Referensi
Cahyani, A. N. (2019). Makna Simbolik Dalam Geguritan “Sengkuni Mbayi” Karya Setyawati Dwi Dijaman Sekarang (Kajian Antropologi Sastra). Jurnal Ikadbudi, 1(8), 1-8.
Defriani, S. A. (2015). Pemikiran Ki Enthus Susmono tentang Tokoh Sengkuni dalam Pewayangan. (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Walisongo Semarang).
Endraswara, S. (2014). Politik gaya Sengkuni dan estetika Semar kajian antropologi sastra terhadap pemilu legislatif. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik, 27(4), 195-205.
Hadi, S. (2004). Metodologi Research Jilid 1. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Hidayat, A. (2012). Aplikasi Teori Hermeneutika dan Wacana Kritis. Purwokerto: STAIN Purwokerto Press.
Mardalis. (2006). Metode Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Muhadjir, N. (2000). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.
Mulyono, S. (1979). Wayang dan Karakter Manusia. Jakarta: Penerbit Gunung Agung.
Nazir, M. (2011). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Saroni, S., Supriyanto, T., & Doyin, M. D. M. (2020). Resepsi Sastra terhadap Kisah Kematian Sengkuni dalam Wiracarita Mahabharata. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana (Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 736-750).
Semi, A. (1990). Metode Penelitian Sastra. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.
Setiawan, A. (2019). Watak Sengkuni Pada Hari Ini. Solopos, 29 Mei 2019.
Shofwan, A. M., & Nurseto, G. N. (2021). Character Building Melalui Kitab Taisirul Khallaq Fi Ilmil Akhlak Karya Syaikh Hafidz Hasan Al-Mas’udi. Raudhah Proud To Be Professionals: Jurnal Tarbiyah Islamiyah, 6(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.48094/raudhah.v6i2.114
Shofwan, A. M., & Rohman, M. (2022). Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Karakter dalam Kitab Syi’ir Ngudi Susila dan Mitra Sejati. Cendekia, 14(01), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.37850/cendekia.v14i01.221
Siong, T. T. (2003). Sang Kuni: Antologi Cerpen. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Narasi.
Subono, B. (1996). Garap Pakeliran. Jakarta: Penerbit Studio.
Sulistyo, Riko. (2022). Relativisme Nilai (Studi tentang Watak Sengkuni dan Kresna dalam Pagelaran Wayang Purwa. (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Salatiga)
Sumantri, B. & Waluyo, K. (1999). Hikmah Abadi: Nilai-nilai Tradisional dalam Wayang. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Triyogo, R. (2013). Sanggit Tokoh dalam Banjaran Sengkuni karya Ki Purbo Asmoro. Surakarta: Institut Seni Indonesia (ISI).
