Kepribadian dan Perubahan Organisasi
Mengelola Respon Individu Terhadap Perubahan dalam Lingkungan Kerja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58472/jkpi.v2i1.235Keywords:
Individuals, Organizations, Work EnvironmentAbstract
This study examines the relationship between individuals’ personal characteristics and their responses to structural transformations in professional contexts. Drawing on theoretical frameworks of personality, such as the Big Five model, the paper explores how attributes like openness to new experiences and emotional stability contribute to individuals’ adaptive capacity. To reduce barriers and optimize work outcomes, the discussion also addresses methods for managing personal responses, including effective dialogue and competency development programs. This review is based on an evaluation of recent scientific publications from the 2020-2024 period and highlights the importance of strategies that take personality profiles into account to ensure the smooth implementation of institutional change.
Downloads
References
Bouckenooghe, D. (2010). Positioning change recipients’ attitudes toward change in the organizational change literature. The Journal of applied behavioral science, 46(4), 500-531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886310367944
Bouckenooghe, D., Raja, U., & Abbas, M. (2014). How does self-regulation of emotions impact employee work engagement: The mediating role of social resources. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(4), 508-525. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.43
Bouckenooghe, D., Schwarz, G. M., Nguyen, P. T., & De Clercq, D. (2025). Person-centered insights into organizational change: Identifying and analyzing profiles using latent profile analysis. Australian Journal of Management, 03128962251334223. https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962251334223
Christou, E., & Piller, F. (2024). Organizational transformation: A management research perspective. Transformation towards sustainability: A novel interdisciplinary framework from RWTH Aachen University, 303-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54700-3_11
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Goh, Y. W., Sawang, S., & Oei, T. P. (2010). The Revised Transactional Model (RTM) of occupational stress and coping: An improved process approach. The Australasian Journal of Organisational Psychology, 3, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajop.3.1.13
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (2021). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Dalam L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). Guilford Press.
Khaw, K. W., Alnoor, A., Al-Abrrow, H., Tiberius, V., Ganesan, Y., & Atshan, N. A. (2023). Reactions towards organizational change: a systematic literature review. Current Psychology, 42(22), 19137-19160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03070-6
Magon, H., Smith, J., Besson, J., Hau, E., Taylor, S., Ruben, J., ... & Lee, Y. Y. (2024). Adapting to change: exploring perceptions and demands of the coronavirus (COVID-19) workforce changes–an Australian multi-institutional radiation oncology survey. Australian Health Review, 48(4), 388-395. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH23183
McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American psychologist, 52(5), 509. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
Niu, J., Jin, C., & Meng, L. (2023). The structural relations of self-control, empathy, interpersonal trust, friendship quality, and mental well-being among adolescents: a cross-national comparative study in China and Canada. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02468-2
Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of applied psychology, 88(4), 680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.680
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Konseling dan Psikologi Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
